lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:42:04 -0700 From: Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com> To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] handle_ing update On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote: > On 5/11/15 3:03 PM, Cong Wang wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:09 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote: >>> >>> There is no difference between having ingress qdisc hanging off of >>> netdevice vs. the classifier list. They both serve the same purpose >>> and the change to use the classifier list merely removes one level >>> of indirection. >> >> >> With adding 8 bytes to each of the netdevice even when it doesn't >> have ingress qdisc attached at all... > > > we already said several times that the work is already on the way > to remove 'ingress_queue' from net_device. It will save much more > memory than addition of 8 bytes. This sounds like adding 8 bytes is a must step for removing more, I seriously doubt. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists