netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHA+R7OH2moexqvJMHG-Mhu16ycp0n7J3B4wHPbrEt-GPY5=Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2015 15:48:14 -0700
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] handle_ing update

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> On 05/12/2015 12:03 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> ...
>>
>> BTW, it should be protected by CONFIG_NET_SCH_INGRESS
>> rather than CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT.
>
>
> Sure, I agree, this can further be improved. Feel free to send a patch.

I never agree on that approach, it makes the code even messy,
less readable. Correctness and readability are much more important
than a little performance gain, for me, not for you of course.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html