[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150512.104539.1602376250460164798.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 10:45:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: David.Laight@...LAB.COM
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, ying.xue@...driver.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, cwang@...pensource.com, xemul@...nvz.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, maxk@....qualcomm.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, tgraf@...g.ch,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, tom@...bertland.com,
jchapman@...alix.com, erik.hugne@...csson.com,
jon.maloy@...csson.com, horms@...ge.net.au,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] net: Add a struct net parameter to sock_create_kern
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 08:24:11 +0000
> Changing the function prototype will a PITA for anyone doing back-ports of fixes.
> (And more so for anyone trying to get a driver to build against kernels
> that might have this change back-ported.)
As someone who actually does such backports every week or two for up
to 5 different -stable releases, I really don't find it to be a big
deal, and I've therefore developed a very low level of sympathy for
this argument so please don't make it as a reason to not make an
interface change.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists