[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1431476690.566.107.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 17:24:50 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net] netlink: move nl_table in read_mostly section
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
netlink sockets creation and deletion heavily modify nl_table_users
and nl_table_lock.
If nl_table is sharing one cache line with one of them, netlink
performance is really bad on SMP.
ffffffff81ff5f00 B nl_table
ffffffff81ff5f0c b nl_table_users
Putting nl_table in read_mostly section increased performance
of my open/delete netlink sockets test by about 80 %
This came up while diagnosing a getaddrinfo() problem.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index daa0b818174b..dbe885901b34 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static inline int netlink_is_kernel(struct sock *sk)
return nlk_sk(sk)->flags & NETLINK_KERNEL_SOCKET;
}
-struct netlink_table *nl_table;
+struct netlink_table *nl_table __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nl_table);
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(nl_table_wait);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists