[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1431776887.2341.17.camel@x220>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 13:48:07 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will.deacon@....com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net, arnd@...db.de,
msalter@...hat.com, hanjun.guo@...aro.org, al.stone@...aro.org,
grant.likely@...aro.org, leo.duran@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V4 PATCH 2/6] arm64 : Introduce support for ACPI _CCA object
Just a nit regarding the commit explanation.
On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 16:23 -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> From http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6.0.pdf,
> section 6.2.17 _CCA states that ARM platforms require ACPI _CCA
> object to be specified for DMA-cabpable devices. This patch introduces
> ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA in arm64 Kconfig to specify such requirement.
s/ACPI_MUST_HAVE_CCA/ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED/.
Ie, update the commit explanation to match the change introduced in V2.
> In case _CCA is missing, arm64 would assign dummy_dma_ops
> to disable DMA capability of the device.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists