[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150527013840.GA20585@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 09:38:41 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ncardwell@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: tcp_tso_autosize() minimum is one packet
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 05:36:34PM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> tldr: "TSO with max_segs==1" <is the same than> "no TSO/GSO"
Not really. They're not identical. For example, before your
patch a packet greater than MSS with TSO disabled would call
tcp_nagle_test, with your patch it will call tcp_tso_should_defer
instead.
Maybe this is OK but it is far from obvious.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists