[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150528135044.GA8313@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 21:50:44 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: ying.xue@...driver.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] neigh: Add missing rcu_assign_pointer
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This patch is not needed.
>
> You really should read Documentation/RCU , because it looks like you are
> quite confused.
>
> When we remove an element from a RCU protected list, all the objects in
> the chain are already ready to be caught by rcu readers.
>
> Therefore, no additional memory barrier is needed before doing *np =
> n->next;
>
> Please do not add spurious memory barriers. Like atomic operations, we
> want all of them being required and possibly documented.
This patch is indeed bogus but accessing an RCU-protected like
this will trigger sparse warnings. So better make it an
RCU_INIT_POINTER.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists