netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next 1/1] hv_netvsc: Properly size the vrss queues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BY2PR0301MB0711A3A5C1A400A54237D039A0CA0@BY2PR0301MB0711.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2015 13:52:47 +0000
From:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
	"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
	"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 1/1] hv_netvsc: Properly size the vrss queues



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@...cle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:06 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org; olaf@...fle.de;
> apw@...onical.com; jasowang@...hat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] hv_netvsc: Properly size the vrss queues
> 
> Since you're redoing this anyway.
> 
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:21:09PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h
> b/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h
> > index ddcc7f8..dd45440 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h
> > @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ struct netvsc_device_info {
> >  	unsigned char mac_adr[ETH_ALEN];
> >  	bool link_state;	/* 0 - link up, 1 - link down */
> >  	int  ring_size;
> > +	u32  max_num_vrss_chns;
> 
> We (Joe and I) have commented before that long names don't mix well with
> the 80 character limit.  You could just leave the "num_" out.  Almost
> all variables are numbers in C so it doesn't add anything.

Thanks Dan. Actually I sent out the revised patch yesterday and I currently don't
Have the 80 char issue. If it is ok with Dave, I will not re-spin the patch. However, I will
note this comment for future work.

K. Y
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html