lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2015 16:57:44 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
	"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
	"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] hv_netvsc: Properly size the vrss queues

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 01:52:47PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@...cle.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 12:06 AM
> > To: KY Srinivasan
> > Cc: davem@...emloft.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org; olaf@...fle.de;
> > apw@...onical.com; jasowang@...hat.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] hv_netvsc: Properly size the vrss queues
> > 
> > Since you're redoing this anyway.
> > 
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:21:09PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h
> > b/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h
> > > index ddcc7f8..dd45440 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h
> > > @@ -161,6 +161,7 @@ struct netvsc_device_info {
> > >  	unsigned char mac_adr[ETH_ALEN];
> > >  	bool link_state;	/* 0 - link up, 1 - link down */
> > >  	int  ring_size;
> > > +	u32  max_num_vrss_chns;
> > 
> > We (Joe and I) have commented before that long names don't mix well with
> > the 80 character limit.  You could just leave the "num_" out.  Almost
> > all variables are numbers in C so it doesn't add anything.
> 
> Thanks Dan. Actually I sent out the revised patch yesterday and I currently don't
> Have the 80 char issue. If it is ok with Dave, I will not re-spin the patch. However, I will
> note this comment for future work.

Yes.  I saw that.  Fine fine.  It wasn't a redo the patch worthy
comment.  :P

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ