[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150528053607.GF27342@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 07:36:08 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm6: Do not use xfrm_local_error for path MTU issues
in tunnels
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:40:32AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> This change makes it so that we use icmpv6_send to report PMTU issues back
> into tunnels in the case that the resulting packet is larger than the MTU
> of the outgoing interface. Previously xfrm_local_error was being used in
> this case, however this was resulting in no changes, I suspect due to the
> fact that the tunnel itself was being kept out of the loop.
>
> This patch fixes PMTU problems seen on ip6_vti tunnels and is based on the
> behavior seen if the socket was orphaned. Instead of requiring the socket
> to be orphaned this patch simply defaults to using icmpv6_send in the case
> that the frame came though a tunnel.
We can use icmpv6_send() just in the case that the packet
was already transmitted by a tunnel device, otherwise we
get the bug back that I mentioned in my other mail.
Not sure if we have something to know that the packet
traversed a tunnel device. That's what I asked in the
thread 'Looking for a lost patch'.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists