[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150608.152144.109876458001741914.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 15:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hannes@...essinduktion.org
Cc: shm@...ulusnetworks.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
dsahern@...il.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, hadi@...atatu.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com,
jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 3/3] rcv path changes for vrf traffic
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 00:13:08 +0200
> It is easy to move the rt_table_id to net_device and use the same
> one for IPv6. This would force people to build symmetric routing
> configurations. I was striving for maximum flexibility first but I
> don't really think this matters here.
Alternatively you could have __ipv4_idev_rt_table(idev) and implement
ipv4_idev_rt_table() in terms of that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists