netdev - Re: [RFC net-next 0/3] Proposal for VRF-lite

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5576F652.4090903@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 09 Jun 2015 08:21:06 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
	Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	hannes@...essinduktion.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	hadi@...atatu.com, davem@...emloft.net, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC:	roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com,
	jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/3] Proposal for VRF-lite

Hi Nicolas:

On 6/9/15 2:58 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> I'm not really in favor of the name 'vrf'. This term is very
> controversial and
> having a consensus of what is/contains a 'vrf' is quite impossible.
> There was already a lot of discussions about this topic on quagga ml
> that show
> that everybody has a different opinion about this term ;-)

Are you referring to this thread?
https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2014-November/011795.html

I could see differing opinions regarding the implementation of a VRF; is 
there really a controversy on what a VRF is?

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html