| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5576FE6A.7000703@6wind.com> Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 16:55:38 +0200 From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com> To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>, hannes@...essinduktion.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, hadi@...atatu.com, davem@...emloft.net, stephen@...workplumber.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org CC: roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com, jtoppins@...ulusnetworks.com, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/3] Proposal for VRF-lite Le 09/06/2015 16:21, David Ahern a écrit : > Hi Nicolas: > > On 6/9/15 2:58 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote: >> I'm not really in favor of the name 'vrf'. This term is very >> controversial and >> having a consensus of what is/contains a 'vrf' is quite impossible. >> There was already a lot of discussions about this topic on quagga ml >> that show >> that everybody has a different opinion about this term ;-) > > Are you referring to this thread? > https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2014-November/011795.html No, there were recent discussions on quagga about that subject. Here is some non-exhaustive pointers: https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2015-May/012581.html https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2015-May/012630.html https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/quagga-dev/2015-June/012715.html Note the last pointer also explains why it was called MRF by Cumulus. Regards, Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists