[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150611.000613.1622512781124407517.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 00:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sfeldma@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiri@...nulli.us, bblanco@...mgrid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] switchdev: fix BUG when port driver doesn't
support set attr op
From: sfeldma@...il.com
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 13:56:02 -0700
> From: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
>
> Fix a BUG() where CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV is set but the driver for a bridged
> port does not support switchdec_port_attr_set op. Don't BUG() if
> -EOPNOTSUPP is returned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
> Reported-by: Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>
> ---
> net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> index e008057..99bced4 100644
> --- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void switchdev_port_attr_set_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> rtnl_lock();
> err = switchdev_port_attr_set(asw->dev, &asw->attr);
> - BUG_ON(err);
> + BUG_ON(err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP);
> rtnl_unlock();
>
> dev_put(asw->dev);
I agree with other feedback, in that this function can return other "normal"
errors like -ENOMEM and that's not absolutely not BUG_ON() material.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists