[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150615164810.0f3c8c8d@free-electrons.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:48:10 +0200
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@...uanux.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: mvneta: introduce tx_csum_limit property
Russell,
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:36:01 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 04:27:22PM +0200, Simon Guinot wrote:
> > This patch introduces the tx_csum_limit DT property. This allows to
> > configure the maximum frame size for which the Ethernet controller is
> > able to perform TCP/IP checksumming. If MTU is set to a value greater
> > than tx_csum_limit, then the features NETIF_F_IP_CSUM and NETIF_F_TSO
> > are disabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@...uanux.org>
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.8+
>
> Sorry, I just tripped over this. This looks like a patch adding a new
> _feature_ to this ethernet driver. It isn't a regression fix, and it
> isn't a bug fix. Why are you wanting to get it into stable kernels,
> which are supposed to only have bug and regression fixes applied?
Look at the cover letter, it is fixing a bug.
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists