[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150615164952.4f2f4dab@free-electrons.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:49:52 +0200
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@...uanux.org>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: mvneta: introduce tx_csum_limit property
Dear Simon Guinot,
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:27:22 +0200, Simon Guinot wrote:
> This patch introduces the tx_csum_limit DT property. This allows to
> configure the maximum frame size for which the Ethernet controller is
> able to perform TCP/IP checksumming. If MTU is set to a value greater
> than tx_csum_limit, then the features NETIF_F_IP_CSUM and NETIF_F_TSO
> are disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@...uanux.org>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.8+
> ---
> .../bindings/net/marvell-armada-370-neta.txt | 3 +++
> drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/marvell-armada-370-neta.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/marvell-armada-370-neta.txt
> index 750d577e8083..db48c83ff0f5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/marvell-armada-370-neta.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/marvell-armada-370-neta.txt
> @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ Required properties:
> - phy-mode: See ethernet.txt file in the same directory
> - clocks: a pointer to the reference clock for this device.
>
> +Optional properties:
> +- tx_csum_limit: max tx packet size for hardware checksum.
To be honest, I'd prefer to have a different compatible string to
identify the two different versions of the hardware block.
The current armada-370-neta would limit the HW checksumming features to
packets smaller than 1600 bytes, while a new armada-xp-neta would not
have this limit.
Yet another case where we should have used "armada-<soc>-neta",
"armada-370-neta" in the .dtsi files for each SoC so that such
modification do not require changing the Device Trees.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists