netdev - Re: [PATCH 08/11] IB/cma: Add net_dev and private data checks to RDMA CM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <558282A3.8040709@mellanox.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:34:43 +0300
From:	Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>
To:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
CC:	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>,
	Guy Shapiro <guysh@...lanox.com>,
	Shachar Raindel <raindel@...lanox.com>,
	Yotam Kenneth <yotamke@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] IB/cma: Add net_dev and private data checks to
 RDMA CM

On 17/06/2015 20:18, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:26:26AM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
>> On 15/06/2015 20:08, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:47:13AM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote:
>>>> Instead of relying on a the ib_cm module to check an incoming CM request's
>>>> private data header, add these checks to the RDMA CM module. This allows a
>>>> following patch to to clean up the ib_cm interface and remove the code that
>>>> looks into the private headers. It will also allow supporting namespaces in
>>>> RDMA CM by making these checks namespace aware later on.
>>>
>>> I was expecting one of these patches to flow the net_device from here:
>>>
>>>> +static struct net_device *cma_get_net_dev(struct ib_cm_event *ib_event,
>>>> +					  const struct cma_req_info *req)
>>>> +{
>>>
>>> Down through cma_req_handler and cma_new_conn_id so that we get rid of
>>> the cma_translate_addr on the ingress side.
>>>
>>> Having the ingress side use one ingress net_device for all processing
>>> seems very important to me...
>>
>> Is it really very important? I thought the bound_dev_if of a passive
>> connection id is only used by the netlink statistics mechanism.
> 
> I mean 'very important' in the sense it makes the RDMA-CM *make
> logical sense*, not so much in the 'can user space tell'.
> 
> So yes, cleaning this seems very important to establish that logical
> narrative of how the packet flows through this code.
> 
> Plus, there is an init_net in the cma_translate_addr path that needs to
> be addressed - so purging cma_translate_addr is a great way to handle
> that. That would leave only the call in rdma_bind_addr, and for bind,
> the process net namespace is the correct thing to use.
Okay, I'll add a patch that cleans these cma_translate_addr calls.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html