[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1506190857520.1731@ja.home.ssi.bg>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:59:01 +0300 (EEST)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, rshearma@...cade.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v2 2/3] ipv4: add support for light weight
tunnel encap attributes
Hello,
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> @@ -366,6 +371,7 @@ static inline size_t fib_nlmsg_size(struct fib_info *fi)
> payload += nla_total_size((RTAX_MAX * nla_total_size(4)));
>
> if (fi->fib_nhs) {
> + size_t nh_encapsize = 0;
Var not in #ifdef. Any warnings with CONFIG_LWTUNNEL=n?
> /* Also handles the special case fib_nhs == 1 */
>
> /* each nexthop is packed in an attribute */
> @@ -374,8 +380,23 @@ static inline size_t fib_nlmsg_size(struct fib_info *fi)
> /* may contain flow and gateway attribute */
> nhsize += 2 * nla_total_size(4);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL
> + /* grab encap info */
> + for_nexthops(fi) {
> + if (nh->nh_lwtstate) {
> + /* RTA_ENCAP_TYPE */
> + nh_encapsize += lwtunnel_get_encap_size(
> + nh->nh_lwtstate);
New labels not in #ifdef:
> +
> +err_inval:
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +errout:
> + return ret;
> }
Some other places may need changes:
- nh_comp: there is logic that decides if same fib_info
is reused from many fib nodes. There should be check
if NH matches by nh_lwtstate.
- xfrm4_fill_dst: not sure about this but some fields
are copied.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists