[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <558424E8.5090806@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 07:19:20 -0700
From: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
CC: ebiederm@...ssion.com, rshearma@...cade.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v2 2/3] ipv4: add support for light weight
tunnel encap attributes
On 6/18/15, 11:59 PM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>
>> @@ -366,6 +371,7 @@ static inline size_t fib_nlmsg_size(struct fib_info *fi)
>> payload += nla_total_size((RTAX_MAX * nla_total_size(4)));
>>
>> if (fi->fib_nhs) {
>> + size_t nh_encapsize = 0;
> Var not in #ifdef. Any warnings with CONFIG_LWTUNNEL=n?
>
>> /* Also handles the special case fib_nhs == 1 */
>>
>> /* each nexthop is packed in an attribute */
>> @@ -374,8 +380,23 @@ static inline size_t fib_nlmsg_size(struct fib_info *fi)
>> /* may contain flow and gateway attribute */
>> nhsize += 2 * nla_total_size(4);
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL
>> + /* grab encap info */
>> + for_nexthops(fi) {
>> + if (nh->nh_lwtstate) {
>> + /* RTA_ENCAP_TYPE */
>> + nh_encapsize += lwtunnel_get_encap_size(
>> + nh->nh_lwtstate);
> New labels not in #ifdef:
Will check and fix all warnings with CONFIG_LWTUNNEL off
>
>> +
>> +err_inval:
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +errout:
>> + return ret;
>> }
> Some other places may need changes:
>
> - nh_comp: there is logic that decides if same fib_info
> is reused from many fib nodes. There should be check
> if NH matches by nh_lwtstate.
yes, i will add that.
>
> - xfrm4_fill_dst: not sure about this but some fields
> are copied.
>
I have not picked up xfrm4_fill_dst specifically, but this infra is
supposed to be similar to that.
I will look.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
Powered by blists - more mailing lists