[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55842D5B.90608@brocade.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:55:23 +0100
From: Robert Shearman <rshearma@...cade.com>
To: roopa <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>, Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
CC: <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, <tgraf@...g.ch>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v2 2/3] ipv4: add support for light weight
tunnel encap attributes
On 19/06/15 15:19, roopa wrote:
> On 6/18/15, 11:59 PM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -366,6 +371,7 @@ static inline size_t fib_nlmsg_size(struct
>>> fib_info *fi)
>>> payload += nla_total_size((RTAX_MAX * nla_total_size(4)));
>>> if (fi->fib_nhs) {
>>> + size_t nh_encapsize = 0;
>> Var not in #ifdef. Any warnings with CONFIG_LWTUNNEL=n?
>>
>>> /* Also handles the special case fib_nhs == 1 */
>>> /* each nexthop is packed in an attribute */
>>> @@ -374,8 +380,23 @@ static inline size_t fib_nlmsg_size(struct
>>> fib_info *fi)
>>> /* may contain flow and gateway attribute */
>>> nhsize += 2 * nla_total_size(4);
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL
>>> + /* grab encap info */
>>> + for_nexthops(fi) {
>>> + if (nh->nh_lwtstate) {
>>> + /* RTA_ENCAP_TYPE */
>>> + nh_encapsize += lwtunnel_get_encap_size(
>>> + nh->nh_lwtstate);
>> New labels not in #ifdef:
> Will check and fix all warnings with CONFIG_LWTUNNEL off
>>
>>> +
>>> +err_inval:
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +errout:
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>> Some other places may need changes:
>>
>> - nh_comp: there is logic that decides if same fib_info
>> is reused from many fib nodes. There should be check
>> if NH matches by nh_lwtstate.
>
> yes, i will add that.
One other place - fib_nh_match. This is used when deleting a route to
verify that any supplied rtnetlink properties match the route in the fib.
Thanks,
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
Powered by blists - more mailing lists