[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150621.094358.971978257754152032.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 09:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ja@....bg
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
ying.xue@...driver.com, alexei@...estorage.com,
joern@...estorage.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net] neigh: do not modify unlinked entries
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 22:56:39 +0300
> The lockless lookups can return entry that is unlinked.
> Sometimes they get reference before last neigh_cleanup_and_release,
> sometimes they do not need reference. Later, any
> modification attempts may result in the following problems:
>
> 1. entry is not destroyed immediately because neigh_update
> can start the timer for dead entry, eg. on change to NUD_REACHABLE
> state. As result, entry lives for some time but is invisible
> and out of control.
>
> 2. __neigh_event_send can run in parallel with neigh_destroy
> while refcnt=0 but if timer is started and expired refcnt can
> reach 0 for second time leading to second neigh_destroy and
> possible crash.
>
> Thanks to Eric Dumazet and Ying Xue for their work and analyze
> on the __neigh_event_send change.
>
> Fixes: 767e97e1e0db ("neigh: RCU conversion of struct neighbour")
> Fixes: a263b3093641 ("ipv4: Make neigh lookups directly in output packet path.")
> Fixes: 6fd6ce2056de ("ipv6: Do not depend on rt->n in ip6_finish_output2().")
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Cc: Ying Xue <ying.xue@...driver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
Powered by blists - more mailing lists