netdev - Re: [PATCH] flow_dissector: Pre-initialize ip_proto in __skb_flow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150625134838.GA2455@nanopsycho.ki.iif.hu>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:48:38 +0200
From:	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	geert@...ux-m68k.org, tom@...bertland.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flow_dissector: Pre-initialize ip_proto in
 __skb_flow_dissect()

Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 03:33:31PM CEST, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:10:32 +0200
>
>> net/core/flow_dissector.c: In function ‘__skb_flow_dissect’:
>> net/core/flow_dissector.c:132: warning: ‘ip_proto’ may be used uninitialized in this function
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
>> ---
>> This may be a false positive, but the state machine in
>> __skb_flow_dissect() is a bit hard to follow.
>> As I believe it is controlled by a packet received from the network, the
>> only safe thing to do is to pre-initialize ip_proto.
>
>Actually I think this is a real bug, because for the ETH_P_MPLS_* cases I cannot
>see what will always set ip_proto before it gets used as an input.

I think that MPLS cases are ok. In this case, return is always hit.
I believe this is false positive.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html