[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5593F956.4020300@certsign.ro>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 17:29:42 +0300
From: Nicolae Rosia <nicolae.rosia@...tsign.ro>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: macb: replace literal constant with NET_IP_ALIGN
On 07/01/2015 04:44 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> I really doubt this adapter can process millions of packets per second ?
I was suggesting this since I was taking into consideration the comment
from skbuff.c, "we can save several CPU cycles by avoiding having to
disable and re-enable IRQs."
Is there a downside to this?
>
> I would rather enable GRO, it would be more useful.
I had no idea what GRO is, so I have read about it [0] and looked at a
couple of drivers which use it. They all seem to
replace netif_receive_skb with napi_gro_receive and when there are no
more packets in napi_pool they call napi_gro_flush.
Is it that simple?
Regards
[0] https://lwn.net/Articles/358910/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists