[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1435764834.4110.132.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 17:33:54 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Nicolae Rosia <nicolae.rosia@...tsign.ro>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: macb: replace literal constant with
NET_IP_ALIGN
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 17:29 +0300, Nicolae Rosia wrote:
> On 07/01/2015 04:44 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > I really doubt this adapter can process millions of packets per second ?
> I was suggesting this since I was taking into consideration the comment
> from skbuff.c, "we can save several CPU cycles by avoiding having to
> disable and re-enable IRQs."
> Is there a downside to this?
This only matters in terms of few nano seconds per packet, so for 10Gb+
NIC anyway. Absolute noise for most NIC.
>
> >
> > I would rather enable GRO, it would be more useful.
> I had no idea what GRO is, so I have read about it [0] and looked at a
> couple of drivers which use it. They all seem to
> replace netif_receive_skb with napi_gro_receive and when there are no
> more packets in napi_pool they call napi_gro_flush.
> Is it that simple?
Yes, but main question is : Do you have the hardware to test your
changes ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists