netdev - Re: Stable request for gso feature flag and error handling fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <15445.1436332253@famine>
Date:	Tue, 07 Jul 2015 22:10:53 -0700
From:	Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Stable request for gso feature flag and error handling fixes

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

>From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
>Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 17:38:50 -0700
>
>> 	Please consider commit
>
>When you ask me to consider commits for -stable you have to tell
>me what -stable releases you want me to submit them for.
>
>Currently I am only doing -stable submissions for 4.1.x, 3.18.x
>and 3.14.x

	I did say:

>	for -stable kernels prior to 3.18 back to 3.10.

	So, this would be just for 3.14.x.  My apologies if I buried
that too far into the message.

	Are the other -stable tree maintainers picking up patches after
you've submitted to 4.1/3.18/3.14, or is it necessary to make separate
requests?

	-J

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html