netdev - Re: [PATCH 02/11] soc/fsl: Introduce DPAA BMan device management driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1436549595.2658.159.camel@freescale.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:33:15 -0500
From:	Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
CC:	Roy Pledge <Roy.Pledge@...escale.com>,
	<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] soc/fsl: Introduce DPAA BMan device management
 driver

On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 13:36 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On do, 2015-07-09 at 16:21 -0400, Roy Pledge wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_DPA_CHECKING
> > +#define DPA_ASSERT(x) \
> > +   do { \
> > +           if (!(x)) { \
> > +                   pr_crit("ASSERT: (%s:%d) %s\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, \
> > +                           __stringify_1(x)); \
> > +                   dump_stack(); \
> > +                   panic("assertion failure"); \
> 
> Not my call, but why panic() here?

I'm pretty sure I've complained about this before (as well as all the 
BUG_ONs).

-Scott

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html