netdev - Re: Fighting out-of-order reception with RPS?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1436763470.24939.66.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:57:50 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc:	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com>,
	Jonathon Reinhart <jonathon.reinhart@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Fighting out-of-order reception with RPS?

On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 21:15 +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:

> E.g. with
> 
> 	skb_set_hash(skb, dev->ifindex, PKT_HASH_TYPE_L2);
> 
> and
> 
> 	echo f > /sys/class/net/can0/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus
> 
> I get properly ordered CAN frames - even with netif_rx() processed skbs. I
> just want to have this stuff to be enabled by default for CAN interfaces to
> kill the OOO frame issue.

I doubt your skb_set_hash() makes any difference.

RPS prefers a L4 hash anyway (skb_get_hash()), so flow dissection
happens.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html