netdev - Re: Fighting out-of-order reception with RPS?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	socketcan@...tkopp.net
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, tom@...bertland.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	sunil.kovvuri@...il.com, jonathon.reinhart@...il.com
Subject: Re: Fighting out-of-order reception with RPS?

From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:15:36 +0200

> Just some remarks about CAN and CAN frames as you suggest GRO which is
> completely pointless for CAN.

GRO may be pointless for CAN, but NAPI _definitely_ is useful for every
single network device, period.

So you should do NAPI for reasons outside of packet receive ordering,
and in return you'll have your packet ordering problem solved as well.

I really am stumped as to why you are avoiding NAPI so vehemently.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html