netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: vnet: relocate netlink code section comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHA+R7NEXSM_p5i3544dzcmZA3_Ey=Ly3tk7hu0okq5AJOQT3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jul 2015 11:51:24 -0700
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: vnet: relocate netlink code section comment

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il> wrote:
> Hi Cong Wang,
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 10:07:00AM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il> wrote:
>> > The veth_setup() routine and the VETH_FEATURES macro are also part of the
>> > netlink interface (referenced from struct rtnl_link_ops). Include them under
>> > the netlink code section comment.
>>
>> Or just remove it? I don't think comment like this one is useful.
>
> The veth.c file contain a few more separator comments. Would you suggest to
> remove them all?
>

Yes, they look all useless for me myself.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html