[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C9CEEB0A-4CF7-4D82-B3E0-D2B3B5FC251E@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:38:13 +0000
From: "Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"idosch@...lanox.com" <idosch@...lanox.com>,
"eladr@...lanox.com" <eladr@...lanox.com>,
"ogerlitz@...lanox.com" <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
"ast@...mgrid.com" <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"simon.horman@...ronome.com" <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
"Andy Gospodarek" <andy@...yhouse.net>,
Shrijeet Mukherjee <shm@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"nhorman@...driver.com" <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 0/4] Introduce Mellanox Technologies Switch
ASICs switchdev drivers
> On Jul 23, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On the CHECKs on space after cast, should we modify checkpatch.pl to
> not flag those for drivers/net?
Please don't. My internal parser really wants to see the cast right up against whatever it is casting. Has this practice been changing and I haven't noticed?
--
Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (842 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists