netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] flow_dissector: remove __flow_hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2015 23:19:34 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] flow_dissector: remove
 __flow_hash_consistentify

On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 13:49 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> The intent of this function was to produce a consistent hash for both
> directions of a flow. However, since we added more inputs to the flow
> hashing (IPv6 flow labels for instance) in a lot of cases we won't get
> the same hash computed for each direction anyway. Also, there is no
> defined correlation between the hashes computed in each direction of a
> flow.
> 
> This patch removes the function since it is not providing significant
> value and is expensive to be called for every packet. If there are
> ever users of the flow_hash_from_keys that did require consistency
> they can swap addresses and ports as needed in the flow_keys before
> calling flow_hash_from_keys.

Have you tested this change with conntracking and RPS enabled ?

This was whole point from commit b249dcb82d327e41

I guess difference is even bigger today after removal of central
conntracking lock.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html