[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2F3C673@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 02:06:40 +0000
From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v2 2/2] r8152: reset device when tx timeout
Oliver Neukum [mailto:oneukum@...e.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 8:59 PM
[...]
> > > > static void rtl8152_tx_timeout(struct net_device *netdev) {
> > > > struct r8152 *tp = netdev_priv(netdev);
> > > > - int i;
> > > >
> > > > netif_warn(tp, tx_err, netdev, "Tx timeout\n");
> > > > - for (i = 0; i < RTL8152_MAX_TX; i++)
> > > > - usb_unlink_urb(tp->tx_info[i].urb);
> > > > +
> > > > + usb_queue_reset_device(tp->intf);
> > > > + cancel_delayed_work(&tp->schedule);
> > >
> > > Sorry to bother you again, but this looks wrong.
> > > You want to cancel first. There is no point in running any work
> > > before the reset is done. It will undo any progress anyway.
> >
> > Excuse me. Do you mean I don't need cancel the other work because it
> > wouldn't be run before the reset is finished?
>
> No, whatever the other work will do, the reset will undo.
Excuse me. I don't understand why I couldn't use usb_queue_reset_device() directly.
Why the reset will undo?
Best Regards,
Hayes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists