lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 28 Jul 2015 20:13:41 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] s390/bpf: Fix multiple macro expansions

On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 16:09 +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> The EMIT6_DISP_LH macro passes the "disp" parameter to the _EMIT6_DISP_LH
> macro. The _EMIT6_DISP_LH macro uses the "disp" parameter twice:
> 
>  unsigned int __disp_h = ((u32)disp) & 0xff000;
>  unsigned int __disp_l = ((u32)disp) & 0x00fff;
> 
> The EMIT6_DISP_LH is used several times with EMIT_CONST_U64() as "disp"
> parameter. Therefore always two constants are created per usage of
> EMIT6_DISP_LH.
> 
> Fix this and add variable "__disp" to avoid multiple expansions.
> 
> Fixes: 054623105728 ("s390/bpf: Add s390x eBPF JIT compiler backend")
> Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 01ad166..de0f0bc 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -221,8 +221,9 @@ static inline void reg_set_seen(struct nbpf_jit *jit, u32 b1)
>  
>  #define EMIT6_DISP_LH(op1, op2, b1, b2, b3, disp)		\
>  ({								\
> +	int __disp = (disp);					\
>  	_EMIT6_DISP_LH(op1 | reg(b1, b2) << 16 |		\
> -		       reg_high(b3) << 8, op2, disp);		\
> +		       reg_high(b3) << 8, op2, __disp);		\
>  	REG_SET_SEEN(b1);					\
>  	REG_SET_SEEN(b2);					\
>  	REG_SET_SEEN(b3);					\

Perhaps it'd be better to change _EMIT6_DISP_LH
---
diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 3a15baa..409e206 100644
--- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -205,8 +205,9 @@ static inline void reg_set_seen(struct bpf_jit *jit,
u32 b1)
 
 #define _EMIT6_DISP_LH(op1, op2, disp)				\
 ({								\
-	unsigned int __disp_h = ((u32)disp) & 0xff000;		\
-	unsigned int __disp_l = ((u32)disp) & 0x00fff;		\
+	u32 _disp = (u32)disp;					\
+	unsigned int __disp_h = _disp & 0xff000;		\
+	unsigned int __disp_l = _disp & 0x00fff;		\
 	_EMIT6(op1 | __disp_l, op2 | __disp_h >> 4);		\
 })
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists