[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150801191741.GA13837@pox.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2015 21:17:41 +0200
From: Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
To: Joe Stringer <joestringer@...ira.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Justin Pettit <jpettit@...ira.com>,
Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
Andy Zhou <azhou@...ira.com>, Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
Florian Westphal <fwestpha@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/9] openvswitch: Scrub packet in
ovs_vport_receive()
On 07/31/15 at 10:51am, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 31 July 2015 at 07:34, Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com> wrote:
> > In general, this shouldn't be necessary as the packet should already be
> > scrubbed before they arrive here.
> >
> > Could you maybe add a WARN_ON and check how those skbs with conntrack
> > data traverse the stack? I also didn't understand why make it dependent
> > on the socket.
>
> OK, sure. One case I could think of is with an OVS internal port in
> another namespace, directly attached to the bridge. I'll have a play
> around with WARN_ON and see if I can come up with something more
> trimmed down.
The OVS internal port will definitely pass through an unscrubbed
packet across namespaces. I think the proper thing to do would be
to scrub but conditionally keep metadata.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists