[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55C0FC83.10504@plumgrid.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:55:15 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
acme@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net
Cc: wangnan0@...wei.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pi3orama@....com, hekuang@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read() that
get the selected hardware PMU conuter
On 8/4/15 1:58 AM, Kaixu Xia wrote:
> +static int check_func_limit(struct bpf_map **mapp, int func_id)
how about 'check_map_func_compatibility' or 'check_map_func_affinity' ?
> +{
> + struct bpf_map *map = *mapp;
why pass pointer to a pointer? single pointer would be be fine.
> + bool bool_map, bool_func;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!map)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i <= ARRAY_SIZE(func_limit); i++) {
> + bool_map = (map->map_type == func_limit[i].map_type);
> + bool_func = (func_id == func_limit[i].func_id);
> + /* only when map & func pair match it can continue.
> + * don't allow any other map type to be passed into
> + * the special func;
> + */
> + if (bool_map != bool_func)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
nice simplification!
the rest of the changes look good.
please respin your next set against net-next.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists