netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read() that get the selected hardware PMU conuter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55C17052.80803@huawei.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:09:22 +0800
From:	xiakaixu <xiakaixu@...wei.com>
To:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
CC:	<davem@...emloft.net>, <acme@...nel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	<jolsa@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pi3orama@....com>,
	<hekuang@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] bpf: Implement function bpf_perf_event_read()
 that get the selected hardware PMU conuter

于 2015/8/5 1:55, Alexei Starovoitov 写道:
> On 8/4/15 1:58 AM, Kaixu Xia wrote:
>> +static int check_func_limit(struct bpf_map **mapp, int func_id)
> 
> how about 'check_map_func_compatibility' or 'check_map_func_affinity' ?
> 
>> +{
>> +    struct bpf_map *map = *mapp;
> 
> why pass pointer to a pointer? single pointer would be be fine.
> 
>> +    bool bool_map, bool_func;
>> +    int i;
>> +
>> +    if (!map)
>> +        return 0;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i <= ARRAY_SIZE(func_limit); i++) {
>> +        bool_map = (map->map_type == func_limit[i].map_type);
>> +        bool_func = (func_id == func_limit[i].func_id);
>> +        /* only when map & func pair match it can continue.
>> +         * don't allow any other map type to be passed into
>> +         * the special func;
>> +         */
>> +        if (bool_map != bool_func)
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +    }
> 
> nice simplification!
> 
> the rest of the changes look good.
> please respin your next set against net-next.

Thanks for your review! I will follow them in the next set.
> 
> 
> .
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html