netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support switchdev FDB objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1084602462.1280363.1439317122548.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date:	Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:	David <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel <kernel@...oirfairelinux.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, andrew@...n.ch,
	sfeldma@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support switchdev
 FDB objects

Hi David,

On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David davem@...emloft.net wrote:

> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
> 
>> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
>> history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)?
> 
> I never will rewrite history, ever.
> 
> Too many people clone my tree and depend upon it.

Sorry, I still don't understand. What are the consequences of:

    git revert -m 1 f1d5ca4

Then applying v3?

You already did that in the past:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/1f2cd84

Thanks,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html