netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support switchdev FDB objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Cc:	f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
	linux@...ck-us.net, andrew@...n.ch, sfeldma@...il.com,
	jiri@...nulli.us
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support switchdev
 FDB objects

From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT)

> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David davem@...emloft.net wrote:
> 
>> From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
>> 
>>> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
>>> history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)?
>> 
>> I never will rewrite history, ever.
>> 
>> Too many people clone my tree and depend upon it.
> 
> Sorry, I still don't understand. What are the consequences of:
> 
>     git revert -m 1 f1d5ca4
> 
> Then applying v3?

In this scenerio I think a relative fixup works better.

> You already did that in the past:
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/1f2cd84

Each and every situation is evaluated by me on a case by case
basis.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html