netdev - Re: Low throughput in VMs using VxLAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55DB53E4.4010105@hp.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:27:00 -0700
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Santosh R <skrastapur@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	tom@...bertland.com
Subject: Re: Low throughput in VMs using VxLAN

On 08/24/2015 09:19 AM, Santosh R wrote:
>   Hi,
>
>     Earlier I was seeing lower throughput in VMs using VxLan as GRO was
> not happening in VM.
> Tom Herbert suggested to use "vxlan: GRO support at tunnel layer" patch series.
> With today's net-next (4.2.0-rc7) in host and VM, I could see GRO
> happening for vxlan, macvtap and virtual interface in VM.
> The throughput is still low between VMs (around 4Gbps compared to
> 9Gbps without VxLAN).

Out of curiosity, have you tried tweaking gro_flush_timeout 
(gro_flush_interval?) for the VMs eth interface?  Say perhaps a value of 
1000?  (I'm assuming the VM is using virtio_net) Does the behaviour 
change if vhost-net is loaded into the host and used by the VM?

rick jones

For completeness, it would also be good to compare the likes of netperf 
TCP_RR between VxLAN and without.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html