lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55DB5F3B.7070903@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:15:23 -0400
From:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>
To:	Santosh R <skrastapur@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	tom@...bertland.com
Subject: Re: Low throughput in VMs using VxLAN

On 08/24/2015 12:19 PM, Santosh R wrote:
>  Hi,
> 
>    Earlier I was seeing lower throughput in VMs using VxLan as GRO was
> not happening in VM.
> Tom Herbert suggested to use "vxlan: GRO support at tunnel layer" patch series.
> With today's net-next (4.2.0-rc7) in host and VM, I could see GRO
> happening for vxlan, macvtap and virtual interface in VM.
> The throughput is still low between VMs (around 4Gbps compared to
> 9Gbps without VxLAN).
> Looks like the packet is getting segmented in Host and then GROed in VM.
> Is this an expected behaviour?

Currently yes.  I am working on adding GSO_TUNNEL and related checksum support
to virtio to eliminate this segmentation.

-vlad


> Is my below configuration correct?
> 
> Here is the configuration.
> eth (VM) - macvtap - vxlan - phy iface  <-> phy iface - vxlan -
> macvtap - (VM) eth
> 
> VM is started with
> # qemu-system-x86_64 -m 4096 -smp 4 -boot c  -device
> virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=C2:B2:CA:6F:BC:A4 -device
> e1000,netdev=tap0,mac=DE:AD:BE:EF:96:32 -netdev tap,id=hostnet0,fd=3
> 3<>/dev/tap18 -netdev tap,id=tap0,script=no  -drive
> file=/root/vdisk_rhel65.img
> 
> Here is the skb_segment count for 10 sec iperf receive test.
> host # ./funccount skb_segment
> Tracing "skb_segment"... Ctrl-C to end.
> ^C
> FUNC                              COUNT
> skb_segment                       58604
> 
> # ./functrace skb_segment
> ...
>          <idle>-0     [006] ..s. 17632.030126: skb_segment <-tcp_gso_segment
>      ksoftirqd/6-38    [006] ..s. 17632.030177: skb_segment <-tcp_gso_segment
>      ksoftirqd/6-38    [006] ..s. 17632.030223: skb_segment <-tcp_gso_segment
>      ksoftirqd/6-38    [006] ..s. 17632.030269: skb_segment <-tcp_gso_segment
>      ksoftirqd/6-38    [006] ..s. 17632.030298: skb_segment <-tcp_gso_segment
>  qemu-system-x86-5932  [006] ..s. 17632.030489: skb_segment <-tcp_gso_segment
>  qemu-system-x86-5932  [006] ..s. 17632.030507: skb_segment <-tcp_gso_segment
>  qemu-system-x86-5932  [006] ..s. 17632.030528: skb_segment <-tcp_gso_segment
>  qemu-system-x86-5932  [006] ..s. 17632.030550: skb_segment <-tcp_gso_segment
>  qemu-system-x86-5932  [006] ..s. 17632.030576: skb_segment <-tcp_gso_segment
>  qemu-system-x86-5932  [006] ..s1 17632.030759: skb_segment <-tcp_gso_segment
>  qemu-system-x86-5932  [006] ..s1 17632.030814: skb_segment <-tcp_gso_segment
> ..
> 
> # Physical interface
> 21:32:49.749263 IP 102.22.22.14.39561 > 102.22.22.12.otv: UDP, length 2870
> 21:32:49.749278 IP 102.22.22.14.39561 > 102.22.22.12.otv: UDP, length 9860
> 21:32:49.749326 IP 102.22.22.12.44214 > 102.22.22.14.otv: UDP, length 74
> 21:32:49.749333 IP 102.22.22.12.44214 > 102.22.22.14.otv: UDP, length 74
> 21:32:49.749340 IP 102.22.22.12.44214 > 102.22.22.14.otv: UDP, length 74
> 21:32:49.749405 IP 102.22.22.14.39561 > 102.22.22.12.otv: UDP, length 2870
> 21:32:49.749425 IP 102.22.22.14.39561 > 102.22.22.12.otv: UDP, length 11258
> 
> # VxLAN
> 21:32:49.749268 IP 102.44.44.14.60616 > 102.44.44.12.commplex-link:
> Flags [.], seq 25:2821, ack 1, win 111, options [nop,nop,TS val
> 15632994 ecr 13334931], length 2796
> 21:32:49.749281 IP 102.44.44.14.60616 > 102.44.44.12.commplex-link:
> Flags [.], seq 2821:12607, ack 1, win 111, options [nop,nop,TS val
> 15632994 ecr 13334931], length 9786
> 21:32:49.749322 IP 102.44.44.12.commplex-link > 102.44.44.14.60616:
> Flags [.], ack 2821, win 270, options [nop,nop,TS val 13334931 ecr
> 15632994], length 0
> 21:32:49.749331 IP 102.44.44.12.commplex-link > 102.44.44.14.60616:
> Flags [.], ack 7015, win 336, options [nop,nop,TS val 13334931 ecr
> 15632994], length 0
> 21:32:49.749336 IP 102.44.44.12.commplex-link > 102.44.44.14.60616:
> Flags [.], ack 12607, win 423, options [nop,nop,TS val 13334931 ecr
> 15632994], length 0
> 21:32:49.749411 IP 102.44.44.14.60616 > 102.44.44.12.commplex-link:
> Flags [.], seq 12607:15403, ack 1, win 111, options [nop,nop,TS val
> 15632994 ecr 13334931], length 2796
> 21:32:49.749429 IP 102.44.44.14.60616 > 102.44.44.12.commplex-link:
> Flags [P.], seq 15403:26587, ack 1, win 111, options [nop,nop,TS val
> 15632994 ecr 13334931], length 11184
> 
> # macvtap
> 2.44.44.14.60616 > 102.44.44.12.commplex-link: Flags [.], seq 25:2821,
> ack 1, win 111, options [nop,nop,TS val 15632994 ecr 13334931], length
> 2796
> 21:32:49.749281 IP 102.44.44.14.60616 > 102.44.44.12.commplex-link:
> Flags [.], seq 2821:12607, ack 1, win 111, options [nop,nop,TS val
> 15632994 ecr 13334931], length 9786
> 21:32:49.749321 IP 102.44.44.12.commplex-link > 102.44.44.14.60616:
> Flags [.], ack 2821, win 270, options [nop,nop,TS val 13334931 ecr
> 15632994], length 0
> 21:32:49.749330 IP 102.44.44.12.commplex-link > 102.44.44.14.60616:
> Flags [.], ack 7015, win 336, options [nop,nop,TS val 13334931 ecr
> 15632994], length 0
> 21:32:49.749335 IP 102.44.44.12.commplex-link > 102.44.44.14.60616:
> Flags [.], ack 12607, win 423, options [nop,nop,TS val 13334931 ecr
> 15632994], length 0
> 21:32:49.749411 IP 102.44.44.14.60616 > 102.44.44.12.commplex-link:
> Flags [.], seq 12607:15403, ack 1, win 111, options [nop,nop,TS val
> 15632994 ecr 13334931], length 2796
> 21:32:49.749429 IP 102.44.44.14.60616 > 102.44.44.12.commplex-link:
> Flags [P.], seq 15403:26587, ack 1, win 111, options [nop,nop,TS val
> 15632994 ecr 13334931], length 11184
> 
> # VM interface
> 2:02:48.126327 IP 102.44.44.14.60616 > 102.44.44.12.commplex-link:
> Flags [.], seq 25:2821, ack 1, win 111, options [nop,nop,TS val
> 15632994 ecr 13334931], length 2796
> 12:02:48.126332 IP 102.44.44.12.commplex-link > 102.44.44.14.60616:
> Flags [.], ack 2821, win 270, options [nop,nop,TS val 13334931 ecr
> 15632994], length 0
> 12:02:48.126352 IP 102.44.44.14.60616 > 102.44.44.12.commplex-link:
> Flags [.], seq 2821:7015, ack 1, win 111, options [nop,nop,TS val
> 15632994 ecr 13334931], length 4194
> 12:02:48.126357 IP 102.44.44.12.commplex-link > 102.44.44.14.60616:
> Flags [.], ack 7015, win 336, options [nop,nop,TS val 13334931 ecr
> 15632994], length 0
> 12:02:48.126361 IP 102.44.44.14.60616 > 102.44.44.12.commplex-link:
> Flags [.], seq 7015:12607, ack 1, win 111, options [nop,nop,TS val
> 15632994 ecr 13334931], length 5592
> 12:02:48.126366 IP 102.44.44.12.commplex-link > 102.44.44.14.60616:
> Flags [.], ack 12607, win 423, options [nop,nop,TS val 13334931 ecr
> 15632994], length 0
> 12:02:48.126468 IP 102.44.44.14.60616 > 102.44.44.12.commplex-link:
> Flags [.], seq 12607:15403, ack 1, win 111, options [nop,nop,TS val
> 15632994 ecr 13334931], length 2796
> 
> Regards
> -Santosh
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ