[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1440809991.8932.97.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:59:51 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net, jiri@...nulli.us, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
tom@...bertland.com, azhou@...ira.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
ipm@...rality.org.uk, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
serge.hallyn@...onical.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anton@....ibm.com,
nacc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/2] net: Optimize snmp stat aggregation by
walking all the percpu data at once
On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 17:35 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> That of course depends on what a "leaf" is and
> whether or not any other function call in the
> "leaf" consumes stack.
>
> inet6_fill_ifla6_attrs does call other functions
> (none of which has the stack frame size of k.alloc)
Just define/use this automatic array in the damn leaf function.
That should not be hard, and maybe no one will complain and we can
work on more complex issues.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists