netdev - Re: [PATCH next 0/30] Passing net through the netfilter hooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150917.171904.119452251415625585.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc:	pablo@...filter.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 0/30] Passing net through the netfilter hooks

From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:59:49 -0500

> Pablo, Dave I don't know whose tree this makes more sense to go
> through.  I am assuming at least initially Pablos as netfilter is
> involved.  From what I have seen there will be a lot of back and forth
> between the netfilter code paths and the routing code paths.

I think it might reduce conflicts actually if it went via my net-next
tree.

Pablo, any objections?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html