netdev - Re: [PATCH next 0/30] Passing net through the netfilter hooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150917.223846.760880389155481640.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 22:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc:	pablo@...filter.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next 0/30] Passing net through the netfilter hooks

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:19:04 -0700 (PDT)

> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:59:49 -0500
> 
>> Pablo, Dave I don't know whose tree this makes more sense to go
>> through.  I am assuming at least initially Pablos as netfilter is
>> involved.  From what I have seen there will be a lot of back and forth
>> between the netfilter code paths and the routing code paths.
> 
> I think it might reduce conflicts actually if it went via my net-next
> tree.
> 
> Pablo, any objections?

I actually decided to just push it out to my tree, if there are any
problems with that I will revert.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html