netdev - [PATCH v2] [net] af_unix: return data from multiple SKBs on recv() with MSG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1442740705-16452-1-git-send-email-aconole@bytheb.org>
Date:	Sun, 20 Sep 2015 05:18:25 -0400
From:	Aaron Conole <aconole@...heb.org>
To:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Aaron Conole <aaron@...heb.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] [net] af_unix: return data from multiple SKBs on recv() with MSG_PEEK flag

From: Aaron Conole <aaron@...heb.org>

AF_UNIX sockets now return multiple skbs from recv() when MSG_PEEK flag
is set.

This is referenced in kernel bugzilla #12323 @
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12323

As described both in the BZ and lkml thread @
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/8/444 calling recv() with MSG_PEEK on an
AF_UNIX socket only reads a single skb, where the desired effect is
to return as much skb data has been queued, until hitting the recv
buffer size (whichever comes first).

The modified MSG_PEEK path will now move to the next skb in the tree
and jump to the again: label, rather than following the natural loop
structure. This requires duplicating some of the loop head actions.

This was tested using the python socketpair python code attached to
the bugzilla issue.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aaron@...heb.org>
---
 net/unix/af_unix.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 03ee4d3..988fbbd4 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -2179,9 +2179,24 @@ unlock:
 			if (UNIXCB(skb).fp)
 				scm.fp = scm_fp_dup(UNIXCB(skb).fp);

-			sk_peek_offset_fwd(sk, chunk);
+			if (skip) {
+				sk_peek_offset_fwd(sk, chunk);
+				skip -= chunk;
+			}

-			break;
+			if (UNIXCB(skb).fp)
+				break;
+
+			/* XXX - this is ugly; a better approach would be
+			 * rewriting this function
+			 */
+			last = skb;
+			last_len = skb->len;
+			unix_state_lock(&sk);
+			skb = skb_peek_next(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
+			if (skb)
+				goto again;
+			goto unlock;
 		}
 	} while (size);

-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html