netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] Convert smsc911x to use ACPI as well as DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5602E7EF.5010904@arm.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:57:03 +0100
From:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:	Jeremy Linton <Jeremy.Linton@....com>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	"steve.glendinning@...well.net" <steve.glendinning@...well.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Convert smsc911x to use ACPI as well as DT



On 23/09/15 18:22, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Marc,
>
> |FWIW, mainline booting with this patch on Juno r1 with ACPI enabled
> dies a |horrible death:
>
> Sorry about the delay, I didn't see this message.
>
> <trimmed>
>
> |How did you get this to work? Firmware release?
>
> Yes, it's a firmware problem with the ACPI tables. It is likely you
> need _DSD changes for the SMSC. If your trying to run juno with ACPI
> there are a few other ACPI table changes you will need beyond what
> was in the last linaro release. I wanted to just provide a direct
> link to the correct firmware in this response, but it seems the
> required version is sort of up in the air at the moment. Be assured I
> will really push on this next week, and will provide a follow up
> here.
>
> Originally, the lack of DSD wasn't a problem, but as this patch
> evolved  the fact that it consolidates a number of configuration code
> paths balancing that got tricky, and ACPI machines with "bad" tables
> were the victims (rather than breaking something I can't control).
>

Even now absence of _DSD *should* continue to be just fine. We can
bailout without initializing the device. Pulling the entire kernel down
just because of an incomplete device entry make no sense IMO.

> In the meantime, if this is blocking anyone I can provide
> instructions on how to update the required ACPI tables.
>

I found that the driver has issues even with DT missing some of the
optional properties. We need to fix it but I don't have much knowledge
of the driver and also not sure how these properties are defined in
ACPI/DSD world i.e. required vs optional.

Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html