[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1443033714.74600.18.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 19:41:54 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, steve.glendinning@...well.net,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, grant.likely@...aro.org,
Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com, Catalin.Marinas@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Convert smsc911x to use ACPI as well as DT
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 17:06 -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>
>
> +static const struct acpi_device_id smsc911x_acpi_match[] = {
> + { "ARMH9118", 0 },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, smsc911x_acpi_match);
> +
> static struct platform_driver smsc911x_driver = {
> .probe = smsc911x_drv_probe,
> .remove = smsc911x_drv_remove,
> @@ -2661,6 +2656,7 @@ static struct platform_driver smsc911x_driver =
> {
> .name = SMSC_CHIPNAME,
> .pm = SMSC911X_PM_OPS,
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(smsc911x_dt_ids),
> + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(smsc911x_acpi_match),
> },
> };
Hm, surely you shouldn't need this part? If the ACPI device has a HID
of PRP0001, and an appropriate "compatible" property, then it ought to
be loaded anyway. If that doesn't work, we should fix that.
--
dwmw2
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5691 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists