[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1443450427.2531.2.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 07:27:07 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc: 'Neil Horman' <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
"linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: sctp: Don't use 64 kilobyte lookup table for
four elements
On Mon, 2015-09-28 at 14:12 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Neil Horman
> > Sent: 28 September 2015 14:51
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 02:34:04PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > > Seemingly innocuous sctp_trans_state_to_prio_map[] array
> > > is way bigger than it looks, since
> > > "[SCTP_UNKNOWN] = 2" expands into "[0xffff] = 2" !
> > >
> > > This patch replaces it with switch() statement.
>
> What about just adding 1 (and masking) before indexing the array?
> That might require a static inline function with a local static array.
>
> Or define the array as (say) [16] and just mask the state before using
> it as an index?
Just let the compiler do its job, instead of obfuscating source.
Compilers can transform a switch into an (optimal) table if it is really
a gain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists