[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56103A3B.4020102@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 13:27:39 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
Pavel Nakonechny <pavel.nakonechny@...tlab.ru>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nbd@...nwrt.org,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] net: dsa: exit probe if no switch were found
Le 03/10/2015 07:26, Neil Armstrong a écrit :
> If no switch were found in dsa_setup_dst, return -ENODEV and
> exit the dsa_probe cleanly.
>
> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
> ---
[snip]
> static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -926,9 +937,9 @@ static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dst);
>
> - dsa_setup_dst(dst, dev, &pdev->dev, pd);
> -
> - return 0;
> + ret = dsa_setup_dst(dst, dev, &pdev->dev, pd);
> + if (!ret)
> + return 0;
That logic is a little weird, I would just go with something like this:
ret = dsa_setup_dst(ds, dev, &pdev->dev, pd);
if (ret)
goto out;
return 0;
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists