[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56137640.8060108@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 08:20:32 +0100
From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
Pavel Nakonechny <pavel.nakonechny@...tlab.ru>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nbd@...nwrt.org,
sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] net: dsa: exit probe if no switch were found
On 10/03/2015 09:27 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Le 03/10/2015 07:26, Neil Armstrong a écrit :
>> If no switch were found in dsa_setup_dst, return -ENODEV and
>> exit the dsa_probe cleanly.
>>
>> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
>> ---
>
> [snip]
>
>> static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> @@ -926,9 +937,9 @@ static int dsa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dst);
>>
>> - dsa_setup_dst(dst, dev, &pdev->dev, pd);
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> + ret = dsa_setup_dst(dst, dev, &pdev->dev, pd);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + return 0;
>
> That logic is a little weird, I would just go with something like this:
>
> ret = dsa_setup_dst(ds, dev, &pdev->dev, pd);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> return 0;
>
Yes you are right, the goto out is needed to clean up the of_probe resources.
I will send a v3 with this fixed.
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists