[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151007060355.GA2152@nanopsycho.orion>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 08:03:55 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@...il.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, eladr@...lanox.com,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
john fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 00/13] rocker: add support for multiple worlds
Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 07:14:39PM CEST, sfeldma@...il.com wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>> Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:56:12AM CEST, sfeldma@...il.com wrote:
>>>On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>>>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
>>>>
>>>> This patchset allows new rocker worlds to be easily added in future (like eBPF
>>>> based one I have been working on). The main part of the patchset is the OF-DPA
>>>> carve-out. It resuts in OF-DPA specific file. Clean cut.
>>>>
>>>> v1->v2:
>>>> - rtnl rocker mode change userspace expose patch was removed
>>>>
>>>> Jiri Pirko (13):
>>>> rocker: remove unused rocker_port param from alloc funcs and shorten
>>>> their names
>>>> rocker: rename rocker.h to rocker_hw.h
>>>> rocker: rename rocker.c to rocker_main.c
>>>> rocker: push tlv processing into separate files
>>>> rocker: implement set settings mode command
>>>> rocker: introduce worlds infrastructure
>>>> rocker: introduce OF-DPA world skeleton
>>>> rocker: set default world on port probe and clean world on remove
>>>> rocker: pass "learning" value as a parameter to
>>>> rocker_port_set_learning
>>>> rocker: pre-allocate wait structures during cmd ring init
>>>> rocker: remove trans parameter to rocker_cmd_exec function
>>>> rocker: call rocker_cmd_exec function with "nowait" boolean instead of
>>>> flags
>>>> rocker: move OF-DPA stuff into separate file
>>>
>>>A couple of my tests are failing with this patchset. A simple port
>>>test is failing and IPv4 routing test is failing.
>>>
>>>The port test is simple: just connect a port on DUT to a port on
>>>another system and assign an IP address to each port and verify IP
>>>connectivity. I have this:
>>>
>>> DUT:sw1p1 (11.0.0.1/24) <-----------> host1:eth0 (11.0.0.2/24)
>>>
>>>The IPv4 routing tests is a bit more complicated to setup. I'm using
>>>OSPF, but I'm not seeing full routes formed in the topology, so I
>>>suspect OSPF hellos aren't getting thru.
>>>
>>>Please fix find/fix these issues and send v3. I don't want any git
>>>bisect issues when running tests. Thanks.
>>
>> I fixed that. Sending v3 in a sec. Thanks.
>
>Sorry, both tests are still broken. Would you send me your tests
>scripts so I can see why your tests are passing?
I'm trying some smoke tests including bridge setup and just ip-ip
setup by hand. Meybe if you send me your scripts, I can run it locally.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists